腾讯视频/爱奇艺/优酷/外卖 充值4折起


‘The Proposition’ And The Exploration Of The Australian Western Genre - Gary Sun

文:海馬 - 2011-04-18 - 《关键协议》- 4颗星

By Gary Sun

Notes: Hi Brigid, this article was originally written by me - Gary Sun

‘The Proposition’ And The Exploration Of The Australian Western Genre

In the nineteenth century, the Australian mainland started to be colonized by the Europeans. This period of history is composed of barbarous racial and intra-racial massacres, atrocities and countless people’s blood. The 2005 film ‘The Proposition’ directed by John Hillcoat and screen-scripted by Nick Cave is one of the rarest remarkable texts, which highlights the status of Australian Western genre in the world literature. Through the ingenious use of camera and narrative structure, ‘The Proposition’ authentically depicts the complexity and destructiveness of the modern Western civilization on Australian continent and thus leaves us to reconsider and reevaluate this specific period of history.

‘The Proposition’ tells a fictional story of the British Captain Stanley making a deal with Charlie Burns in order to stop his older brother Arthur’s outrages in town. Charlie has to kill Arthur, otherwise his teenage simpleton brother Mickey will be hanged for rape and murder on the approaching Christmas day. In this essay, the text will be discussed in terms of genre, especially by analyzing the last scene: While Captain Stanley and his wife Martha are having dinner for Christmas, Arthur invades their house and violently turns everything into chaos, and later is shot by arriving Charlie.

The genre of the text is generally classified as Western. Since Western genre was initiated by great American directors John Ford and Howard Hawks during twenties of the last century, Western films have always been linked to the Hollywood. ‘The proposition’ as an Australian version of Western genre, obviously shares many similar elements with the American ones. In the last scene, we can tell those characteristics from the vast and desolate desert outside Captain Stanley’s house, Arthur’s revolver, Charlie’s horse and the tragedy of Captain Stanley who symbolizes the power and authority of the colonial government.

However, Australian bushrangers should not simply be considered as equivalent to American cowboys. According to Jack Sargeant, ‘the American outlaw is pursing a variant of the American Dream, albeit by amoral means, while the Australian bushranger is simply trying to survive against the odds, driven to his cold circumstance’ Hence, Australian Western is perceived as a new genre by combining American Western elements and the unique historicity of Australia together; a new genre which is often named bushranger film. Often the heroic and romantic depiction of outlaws is mythologized and reinforced in classic American texts, not as the authentic reflection of the history. However, in ‘The Proposition’, this idea of heroism is challenged and even rejected. Instead of being legends, bushrangers in ‘The Proposition’ are depicted as ordinary human beings who also make mistakes and bear moral ambiguity.

For example, Arthur is rather portrayed as a romantic and poetic figure in the text: he gallops across the vast desert to rescue his brother; he sits in the sunset and praises the beauty of the nature; he seeks a perfect bond of family; he expresses once that dying alone without the people he loves is horrifying. However in the scene where he takes his revenge on Captain Stanley for the proposition by asking his subordinate Samuel to sing while raping Martha in front of Stanley. When Charlie tells him that Mickey is dead, Arthur doesn’t seem to care and continue praise Samuel’s singing. The image of Arthur suddenly becomes ambiguous. Arthur’s charm and humanism seem to evaporate. Instead, he is turning into a hateful viper.

As the centered character, Charlie’s experience is much more complex than punishing the despicable. He is given the most difficult question in the world: he has to decide which of his brother is going to die. He fails to shoot Arthur on several occasions which demonstrates his struggles. After Mickey’s death, he arrives at Stanley’s house and therefore finds out Arthur’s atrocity. Even though Captain Stanley has breached his proposition, Charlie helps to stop the ongoing tragedy by shooting his brother to death. Charlie’s movements and attitudes are seen as righteous and enlightened since he tries to stop the continuation of violence in town. In fact, however, this character is trapped by great confusion, helplessness and self-contradiction. ‘I’m going to be with my brother.’ Charlie says to Captain Stanley. Even though he is disappointed at Arthur, he still loves his brother. Thus his image is portrayed as passive, struggling and morally ambiguous. What he does should not be seen as a reflection of heroism, but a way to survive under the oppressive and cruel environment. As Jack Sargeant stresses in his article, ‘there is no glamour or heroism here, just the pragmatics of needing to survive over the next few weeks, days, hours, even minutes.’

More importantly, in order to dramatize the epic stories of outlaws, the authority is always depicted as corrupted, oppressive, violent and unjustified in classic American Western films. In fact, ‘The Proposition’ does reflect the brutality of Australian colonial government in Queensland as the authority figure. For instance, to civilize the place, the police office often indiscriminately arrests and tortures local Aborigines, which is referred to the process of assimilation or annihilation. Conflict definitely plays a crucial role in leading and developing the remarkable narratives of Australian bushranger films.

However, character Captain Stanley’s experience slightly contrasts with the classic brutish characteristics of authority figures. ‘I am going to civilize this place’, Stanley’s early line reveals his power and authority straight away to the audience. However, his attempt to seek for real justice shows that he is less insensitive. When Stanley’s superior Captain Fletcher orders him to whip Mickey as punishment, Stanley fights against Fletcher and tries his best to protect Mickey, not only because this would hold the proposition, but also because Stanley believes that it is unfair for Mickey to undertake the punishment. After Mickey being whipped to unconsciousness, Stanley’s talking care of him shows his kindness and humanism. Therefore this character gains some sympathy from the audience in the scene where he gets beaten up and even shot. According to Jane Stadler’s statement, ‘The Proposition’ depicts a series of obliquely related acts of interracial and intra-racial violence and retribution in which heros, villains and innocent parties are ill-defined.’ Therefore, apart from complex racial conflicts, moral ambiguity plays also a key role in making Australian bushranger genre distinctive from the American Western genre.

In addition, a unique Australian Western genre is not only conveyed narratively but also cinematographically in ‘The Proposition’. The text uses the Australian landscape to draw a distinction between Australian and American Western films. Since the story is set in the outback Queensland in the nineteenth century, with the scenery of the desolate and bare desert with numerous flies and unbearable heat, ‘The Proposition’ depicts Australia as an inhospitable and uncivilized ‘fresh hell’. The vast desert landscape in a endless vista is shown in the selected scene where Charlie gallops across the desert to Stanley’s house. Compared with Stanley’s ‘little England’ in the middle of the desert which symbolizes civilization and modernity, the Australian continent seems to be full of dangers and unknowns. This is linked to the argument that, instead of defending something against injustices, Australian bushrangers are more concerned to survive from the dreadful environment. Interestingly, the use of landscapes in ‘The Proposition’ does not only contrast internationally but also intra-nationally. Compared with other Australian bushranger films such as ‘Ned Kelly’, landscapes in ‘The Proposition’ is bright and contrasting in colors. As Rebekah Brammer mentions in her article, ‘silhouettes against blood-orange sunsets are also used at salient point in the story.’ In the selected scene, Arthur sits in the magnificent sunset while bleeding to death. His sad demise contrasted with the landscape emphasizes the conflict between brutality and beauty echoing on the continent.

In conclusion, ‘The Proposition’ tells its own western story of Australian and more focuses on the authenticity of the brutal Australian colonial history rather than mythology of classic outlaws of Hollywood or famous Australian bushrangers such as Ned Kelly. It really brings Australian western genre into a new level, distinguishable from Western stories elsewhere. As the screen-writer Nick Cave says in an interview, ‘we didn’t want it to sound like an American western that had been dumped in Australia. There is a certain incompetence that exists in the Australian character today, a real savagery and cruelty behind that kind of attitude.’ he adds ‘this film is about an isolated community, people struggling in a place where they really have no right to be.’

 Reference:
Brammer, Rebekah, Ned Kelly vs The Proposition: Contrasting images of Colonialism, Landscape and the Bushranger, Metro Magazine, issue 158, September 2008
Hillcoat, John (director) and Cave, Nick (script writer), The Proposition, 2005
Nick Cave and John Hillcoat: The Proposition Interview, futuremoveis, http://www.futuremovies.co.uk/filmmaking.asp?ID=159, 27 February 2006
Stargeant, Jack, Bloodshed Down Under: Mad Dog Morgan And The Proposition, issue 161, June 2009
Stadler, Jane, Landscape Spaces’ Colonial History, Metro Magazine, issue 163, December 2009


导演:约翰·希尔寇特
编剧:尼克·凯夫
主演:雷·温斯顿,盖·皮尔斯,艾米丽·沃森,丹尼·赫斯顿,理查德·威尔森,大卫·文翰,约翰·赫特
类型:剧情
制片国家/地区::澳大利亚 / 英国
语言:英语
时间:2005-10-06

关键协议的其他评论

编剧兼音乐创作人尼克•凯夫Nick Cave访谈

杰诺拉泽 2013-12-20 评价:5颗星
记者(以下简称"记"):<关键协议>是怎么成型的?Nick Cave(以下简称"NC"):我和导演John Hillcoat认识有20来年了,在这20年里有18年他都在想着去拍一拍澳大利亚西部,并且由我来负责做音乐部分.我和他一起工作已经18年了,到最后,他拿了个从美国西部故事改编成的澳大利亚西部片剧本给我,其实我们都知道这根本不是我们想要的东西.他说:"好了,滚[文明用语]蛋,你来写."就这样,我就开始干了并且在三周内完成了剧本.当

Nick Cave&#39;s wild wild west

WWW 2009-06-27 评价:5颗星
'When?' said the moon to the stars in the sky'Soon' said the wind that followed them all'Who?' said the cloud that started to cry'Me' said the rider as dry as a bone'How?' said the sun that melted the groundand 'Why?' said the river that refused to r

夜莺在歌唱

shooter 2011-03-21 评价:5颗星
2008-10-15 从前我有一张Nick Cave &Bad Seeds的卡带,正听得不亦乐乎的日子里,却莫名消失了. 电影给人的感觉如同Nick Cave的歌曲一样,黑暗而动听. 澳大利亚一个荒蛮之地,连警察局长的老婆都像猪一样丑陋.但却有着非同一般美好的景致. 当查尔斯站着夜空下,天上的星星多的感觉很假. 无边无际的平原上天空总是很低,无论是夕阳还是云彩都美的让人颤抖. 人之初性本恶,麻木的群氓在并没有证据的情况下将查尔斯的弟弟鞭挞致死,而女人,特别是女人,就是警察局长的老婆,代表了一切伪

欲哭无泪的电影,赞!

自然醒 2007-02-01 评价:5颗星
先摘录Nick的访谈的几个我很赞同的片段(转自伊万的BLOG,谢谢你的翻译):<关键协议>里的英雄比较阴暗,你可能会同情某个人物,同时觉得另一个人物是罪有应得的,但到最后,你却分不清哪个人是值得同情的,而哪个人是罪有应得的.有时候你会觉得自己和某个角色的想法一致,但后来又觉得和另一个角色的想法一致了.这些角色都在被他们的愚蠢所慢慢毁灭.对我来说,片中唯一的恶棍是那个霸占小镇并且施加暴力的人.但是从这部电影所要表达的中心意义来说,这是一群本不该待在这片土地上的人的故事,也许地球上本来就该有一些地

干净的西部电影

教师瓦 2008-04-13 评价:4颗星
关键协议tags: Nick Cave Guy Pearce 西部本来是冲着Guy Pearce去的,看完以后发现,好久没看到这么干净的电影了.一直对西部片很有爱~广袤的景色,漫天扬起的黄沙,在荒凉的情境设定下,人物故事性就显得非常强了.说到Guy Pearce,洛城机密中亦正亦邪的年轻警察,factory girl中"真实"的安迪沃霍尔,新片death defying acts中不温不火的魔术师,更不必提记忆碎片中遍布纹身的姣好身材...相信也是大多数此片粉丝的热情来源~ ~像这样外

【转载】 李劼 血色残阳下的逐鹿和赌命

彩云追月 2013-04-03 评价:4颗星
官兵捉强盗的游戏,玩到后来总是分不清谁是官兵,谁是强盗:谁是猎人,谁是猎物.从一场官家围剿强盗的枪战开始的好莱坞电影<猎杀>("The Proposition"),恐怕就是这么一场官盗难分的格斗.场景,澳大利亚昆士兰内陆:时间,1880年代:背景,无边无际的荒漠,还有如血的残阳.凶悍的强盗,残暴的官兵,粗犷的土著,加上怪石嶙峋的山谷,桀骜不驯的植物,生动地构勒出一副地狱般的图像,从中爆出一群仙人掌一般的人物.借用剧中人物所念叨的一句莎士比亚台,叫做"这是个什么样的

满后背苍蝇版“澳大利亚”

最后的穴居人 2010-01-09 评价:4颗星
澳大利亚西部片,我有史以来看过的最血腥的片(日本片除外).白人杀黑人.黑人杀黑人.白人杀白人三部分组成.那种神也救不了你的感觉,英系的沉重,和以前看的"风吹稻浪"."稻草狗"挺像.可最后那个讨厌的政客还是没有死!音乐很棒,尤其是开头的提琴女童声:There is happy land far far away~~

《关键协议》:暴力而诗意的骑士之歌

feeling 2008-10-09 评价:4颗星
暴力,血腥,污秽:粗砺,蛮荒,冷冽:荒野,落日,骑士:优美,抒情,诗意--女人是不合时宜的干净和优雅:男人是暴力之后的悲哀与孤独.这是一个善良的人讲述的暴力的故事,历史尘封背后难以尽述的黑与白,好与坏. 看完这部电影,对<末日危途>又有了更多期待--  月亮对星星说:何时?伴随他回家的风说:很快.开始哭泣的乌云说:是谁?形如枯骨的骑士说:是我.熔化大地的太阳说:怎样?拒绝流动的河流说:为何?一声不响的雷神说:哪里?拿出手枪的骑士说:这里.

Rider&#39;s Song

一一 2009-11-23 评价:3颗星
这个电影豆瓣上的评论都不靠谱导演的讲故事的能力有待提高音乐很好,电影颜色也不赖,台词值得细细品我根本就不明白一开始的枪战片是怎么回事寻亲复仇似乎没有逻辑到结尾杀掉Arthur更没有道理The Burn's Family三兄弟就这样莫名其妙地被残杀貌似王家卫的风格,不过故事连不成串一个叫Eliza Hopkins的poor woman had a child in her belly不知道谁是凶手死了剧中暗示Micky是rapist可是又说Arthur是一个abominationso Charli